The case of the death of the girl Paulette Farah Gebara represented, with the penalty incident, a challenge to the political intelligence, the criminal investigation, and did bring to mind the urgency of Mexico have police laboratories such as CSI or "medical detectives."
But at the same time reminded the great novels and stories of criminals and police enigmas: Gaston Leroux, Edgar Allan Poe, Agatha Crhistian, Arthur Conan Doyle, George Simenon and even JP.D. James, plus some parts of Mankell and Patricia Cornwell. All of them based their characters on the ability to reason and opened a vein of the criminal investigation of intelligence. essential data Paulette case shorten the list: a girl was reported missing from his room and his body "appears" nine days later in the same room closed. It is, therefore, a criminal enigma in a closed room. The most famous story - the wellspring of all others - is that of Poe, "The Murders in the Rue Morgue," published in 1841, because the inquiry and the solution is based on pure reasoning intellectual. In this tale Poe developed what would be his proposal for the investigation of intelligence and police methods of disdains the protocol and even inefficient.
Poe's story is simple: in newspapers published news of two gruesome murders on the fourth floor of a house. Two women were horribly murdered, one appeared embedded in the chimney draft and another in the courtyard beneath the window. But the puzzling case was that it was a closed room inside. In that story appears detective C. August Dupin, a rational mind living on the help of his friends. Without engaging in police methods and only from observation and intellectual reasoning, addition to the direct study of the crime scene, Dupin solves the mystery. Detective Dupin was invented by Poe, but only appeared in three stories. Doyle began publishing the Holmes stories a little more than forty years after Poe. In addition, there are two different mentalities: the French rogue phlegmatic Dupin and Holmes.
Dupin thinks out loud, with the narrator of the story that could be Poe himself in the role of assistant Dupin, Poe's also much that is, Poe in the mirror. From arguments of intelligence, Dupin solves the mystery of the crime in a locked room inside. Dupin's reasoning could now help in the case Paulette:
Having solved the riddle of the crimes in the Rue Morgue, Auguste Dupin joked about the commissioner had submitted a false and purely police solution, "there is no fiber in their science, all on it's head more without a body, like the paintings of the goddess Laverna, or, rather, all head and back, such as cod.
However, it is a good person. We particularly appreciate a masterstroke of involvement, which owes its reputation as a man of talent. I mean his way of denying what it is and explain what is not, "quoted by some of Rousseau. Dupin's own intellectual unfolding Edgar Allan Poe in its early master of enigma and intellectual reasoning, he had reflected on the two horrific murders on the fourth floor of a house in the Rue Morgue. In his explanation to his friend - a kind of Dr. Watson of the English novel from a friend of Sherlock Holmes - Dupin's reasoning provides some clues to his statement: - The Parisian police, so praised in its penetration is very clever but nothing more. Not applicable to method, except the moment. It takes many provisions ostentatious, but often they are ill suited to its target ... The results are often surprising, but most are achieved by simple diligence and activity. When these are insufficient, all his plans fail.
"Inspector Vidocque ... damaged his vision by holding the object too close. Maybe I could see one or two points with singular acuity, but by so doing lost the whole subject. In the background was too much depth and truth is not always within a well.
- I think that, as regards the most important knowledge is invariably superficial. The depth corresponds to the valleys where we seek, not the mountain peaks, where it is found.
- For the murders (in the Rue Morgue), proceed to an examination in person before forming an opinion.
After an examination of crime scene Dupin returned to his reflections:
- I have the impression that this mystery is considered insoluble for the very reasons that should lead us to consider easily solved, I mean it too, to the outré (something like strange, bizarre) of characteristics. The police are confounded by the apparent lack of mobility, not the murder itself, but by his atrocity.
- (The police) have fallen into the gross but common error of confounding the unusual with the abstruse (difficult to understand for intelligence). But it is precisely through these deviations from ordinary plane of things, the reason will make its way, if this is possible in the search for truth. - In investigations such as we make now should not ask both "what happened" as "what is in what happened that does not look like nothing happened before." In short, the ease with which they arrive or have arrived at the solution of this mystery is in direct proportion to its apparent insolubility in the eyes of the police.
- In general, the similarities are great obstacles in the way of those thinkers who ignore all of the theory of probabilities, that theory to which the most prominent targets of human research is in the highest examples.
- My intention is to show first that the fact (the hypothesis of how the murderer opened the window and left sealed inside) could be done, but secondly, and especially (italics Poe), insist on calling their attention to the extraordinary, almost supernatural, that can force such a thing.
- Using legal terms, you will no doubt tell me to "round out" my case not to be underestimated and so the evidence of the flexibility that is required for this feat. But the practice in court is not the reason. My ultimate goal is just the truth. And my immediate purpose is to induce the juxtaposition that unusual agility, which I mentioned in that voice so strangely acute - or rough - and uneven on whose nationality could not agree and witnesses whose accents did not distinguish no word articles.
And before the theft hypothesis of the existence of gold coins, Dupin makes seeing that gold was abandoned. Reason:
- I ask, therefore, to discard their thoughts the blundering idea of \u200b\u200ba mobile, born in the brain of the policemen in that part of the testimony that relates to money paid at the door of the house. Coincidences ten times as remarkable as this occur every hour of our lives without us to worry about them. In general, the similarities are major obstacles in the way of those thinkers who ignore all of the theory of probabilities, that theory to which the most prominent targets of human research are the highest examples. Dupin
analyzes the points that had led police to a dead output: the singular voice heard by all, that unusual agility, the murderer, the power to damage and the surprising lack of mobility "in a murder so heinous as this."
By winning the game against the detective, Dupin describes his victory with a devastating phrase: "our friend the Prefect is too cunning to be profound."
method Dupin was started by the reasoning of inexplicable events, to make them explicable, find the solution. At the beginning of his story, Poe's unnamed narrator acts as "the analytical power should not be confused with mere wit, because if the analyst is necessarily ingenious
often witty man is remarkably unable to analyze." Enigma
police literature has always been a challenge to investigative journalists. Before she died, columnist Manuel Buendía spent hours rereading the story "hand-carved coffins" by Truman Capote, based on a true story, to discover the murderer. If I remember correctly, came Buendía to the conclusion that the murderer was the police investigating the case. Capote will have to reread. The investigative powers of the journalists was based on the fact that the gateway to practical journalism was exactly the source of police information. The reporters had to spend a few months in police issues to learn research methods, practice, of course, now defunct. In those days, worked Buendía police reporter at La Prensa and competed with detectives in the investigation of certain crimes. Police
Every reporter has to be respected in the center of their activity murders in locked rooms. Perhaps en el fondo, porque representan un desafío a la inteligencia y por la fascinación del crimen en sí mismo. Al final de cuentas, como lo estableció Thomas de Quincey, el asesinato puede considerase como “una de las bellas artes”: “en los crímenes del circo, la mano que asesta el golpe mortal está tan teñida de sangre como la de quien contempla pasivamente el espectáculo; ni puede estar libre de mancha quien tolera el derramamiento ni puede exculparse del asesinato quien aplaude al asesino o recoge los premios en su nombre”. De Quincey deja entrever el asesinato como un espectáculo de masas, hoy potenciado por el papel activo de los medios de comunicación y las redes sociales cibernéticas.
The criminal conflict mediation is not new. For Paulette grew up in the media and twitter, but not to bring items to put pressure on authorities. And then came the interpretations and assumptions of the media themselves, each putting forward their concerns and proposals on the crime.
would not be the first nor the last. In his book Politics and crime, the German essayist Hans Magnus Enzensberger tells the story of Wilma Montesi case, an Italian woman who was found dead in April 1953, which determined death by accident and then involved the hypothesis of a crime to hide perverse relationship of organized crime with senior Italian politicians of the Christian Democrats. The event was described by the media as "The Case of the Century" and actually lasted almost five years under pressure from the media itself with hypothetical arguments that never passed the test of judicial proceedings. The same case was told in 1955 by the writer Gabriel García Márquez in a text of nearly sixty pages long - "The scandal of the century" - the book From Europe to America. Journalistic work 3. 1955-1969, and that also refers to the pressure of the press to avoid shelved the investigation. Enzensberger
provides a more comprehensive idea of \u200b\u200bthe case. "In Crime Investigation is investigating the company itself. Hence the enormous interest in Italy is often a big "if" by workers and intellectuals, citizens and peasants, rich and poor. They all try to decipher something in it (the crime), which is its own skill.
As in all great crime that moves the country, including in the Montesi case, where the girl drowned in the "trial of the century", is Italy which itself is processed. " The deepened probing assumptions and data, but in the end, says Enzensberger, the prevailing social service in Italy (and every society that respects), "The rumor and the dossier. " Every citizen became a police inspector, detective and court investigator. In the end, the court system concluded the obvious: "The rumors are not evidence." However, the rumors became assumptions and these were followed as investigations but with specific targets to be tested. And when one of the main suspects was the son of Minister of Foreign Affairs.
Indeed, the first end of the thread, when nobody was paying attention to the case of a young woman who appeared choked, the hypothesis of crime appeared in print: a cartoon with a homing pigeon that was at the peak of a women's league that are placed in the thigh. The league had been mentioned as strange track in the case, as the father of Montesi said the body of her daughter was not just the league that she used. And the other data was not difficult to interpret: in the Italian language, the word is written as pigeon and Piccioni Piccioni was just the name of the chancellor, whose son was immediately identified as the culprit of the crime.
the end, the media were caught in a case inflated by themselves. Enzensberger concludes: "The rumors are not evidence. The prosecution has to know., How was it possible that a prosecutor, as based on insufficient evidence, could bring charges against men as the son of a minister, as the chief of police in Rome? Yes to this question can be answered easily. When Piero Piccioni (son of the Chancellor) was arrested, Italy was on the brink of revolt and civil war. The public pressure was overwhelming. But how could he channeled that pressure? "At the end Piccioni was acquitted. And as the case was unresolved. Enzensberger added: "This question leads us to the truth of this process, so full of lies. The Italian people believed every word you said Anna Maria Caglio (a witness inflated by a magazine) and for no other reason but because mitómana Joan of Arc, "the girl of the century" He was accused of killing the son of a minister. Italy was ready to believe all that went against their ruling class. " Thus, "the drowned girl was only a pretext, a long-awaited pretext to settle accounts with a social order whose eventual exponent were the defendants in this process. The defendants, he added, were innocent of the charges of murder, but "they were guilty only of belonging to those who are concerned voices asking Italy to his arrest. And this guilt is not possible acquittal. " The defendants were released, Italy returned to his quiet and Wilma Montesi was only waiting for justice that has not arrived. Hence
the only possible conclusion: is it a scapegoat Paulette Mexico waiting at the stage of decomposition police, criminal and social? Is Paulette outraged society as a form of indignant with herself? Paulette Will the media phenomenon of the Chupacabras was invented at the time of the presidency of Carlos Salinas to distract social? Will the social and inquiry panic popular substitute for the lost stability? And what comes after Paulette?
By Carlos Ramirez. Post
RLB.Punto Politico.
Indeed, the first end of the thread, when nobody was paying attention to the case of a young woman who appeared choked, the hypothesis of crime appeared in print: a cartoon with a homing pigeon that was at the peak of a women's league that are placed in the thigh. The league had been mentioned as strange track in the case, as the father of Montesi said the body of her daughter was not just the league that she used. And the other data was not difficult to interpret: in the Italian language, the word is written as pigeon and Piccioni Piccioni was just the name of the chancellor, whose son was immediately identified as the culprit of the crime.
the end, the media were caught in a case inflated by themselves. Enzensberger concludes: "The rumors are not evidence. The prosecution has to know., How was it possible that a prosecutor, as based on insufficient evidence, could bring charges against men as the son of a minister, as the chief of police in Rome? Yes to this question can be answered easily. When Piero Piccioni (son of the Chancellor) was arrested, Italy was on the brink of revolt and civil war. The public pressure was overwhelming. But how could he channeled that pressure? "At the end Piccioni was acquitted. And as the case was unresolved. Enzensberger added: "This question leads us to the truth of this process, so full of lies. The Italian people believed every word you said Anna Maria Caglio (a witness inflated by a magazine) and for no other reason but because mitómana Joan of Arc, "the girl of the century" He was accused of killing the son of a minister. Italy was ready to believe all that went against their ruling class. " Thus, "the drowned girl was only a pretext, a long-awaited pretext to settle accounts with a social order whose eventual exponent were the defendants in this process. The defendants, he added, were innocent of the charges of murder, but "they were guilty only of belonging to those who are concerned voices asking Italy to his arrest. And this guilt is not possible acquittal. " The defendants were released, Italy returned to his quiet and Wilma Montesi was only waiting for justice that has not arrived. Hence
the only possible conclusion: is it a scapegoat Paulette Mexico waiting at the stage of decomposition police, criminal and social? Is Paulette outraged society as a form of indignant with herself? Paulette Will the media phenomenon of the Chupacabras was invented at the time of the presidency of Carlos Salinas to distract social? Will the social and inquiry panic popular substitute for the lost stability? And what comes after Paulette?
By Carlos Ramirez. Post
RLB.Punto Politico.
0 comments:
Post a Comment